![]() |
336 Mountain Way Drive |
Application Note 1001
Using Non-Contact Speed Sensing to Measure Vehicle Ground Speed
An advantage of using a non-contact speed sensor over other methods such as measuring wheel rotation is that the speed measurement is not affected by such factors as wheel slip, allowing a better measurement of true ground speed. The data in Figure Two clearly show such features as gear shifting, acceleration, coasting and braking. In this test, the vehicle was driven over an asphalt surface, but the sensor may be used on other surfaces such as gravel or dirt. Offset Angle The offset angle shown in Figure One is the nominal offset angle. This is the angle between the center axis of the radar beam and the horizontal in the vertical plane. Because of factors involving geometry and relative strengths of the return signal from the ground ahead of and behind the center axis of the radar beam, the effective offset angle will differ from the nominal and requires a correction. Table One shows the results of testing conducted to determine the effective offset angles using the speed sensor on vehicles driven over asphalt. To use the table, replace the nominal offset angle actually used by the corresponding effective offset angle when correcting for the offset angle. (See Application Note 1000, Fundamentals of Non-Contact Speed Measurement Using Doppler Radar.) For convenience, the cosine of the effective offset angle is also given in the table.
Table One - Effective Offset Angles On Asphalt
The particular choice of nominal offset angle involves a tradeoff between several factors. Placing the sensor at a steeper angle increases signal strength and reduces the field of view of the sensor so that it does not see non-targets such as other vehicles. On the other hand, a steeper angle also increases sensitivity of the sensor to vertical motions and may introduce more variation in the vehicle ground speed measurement because of pitching of the vehicle on its suspension. The accuracy of the speed measurement using this method of offset angle correction depends on the accuracy to which the offset angle is known. For instance, with a 30º offset angle, a 1º uncertainty in offset angle can cause a 1 - 2% uncertainty in the speed measurement. If greater accuracy is required, the sensor can be calibrated by other methods such as distance comparison achieved by recording the number of pulses received from the sensor while the vehicles travels over a fixed distance. The sensor should be aligned parallel to the direction of vehicle travel so that there is no horizontal offset angle. It is also important to consider factors such as suspension pitching, vibration, and dust or water spray when choosing a mounting location for the sensor. For example, a forward-pointing sensor may be indicated for applications where dust or water spray is expected at the rear of the vehicle which might interfere with the radar beam. The sensor should be mounted on a rigid location located away from engine vibration. Some suspension pitching is evident in Figure Two, where the vehicle under test was, in fact, driven over bumps and had a stiff suspension. These effects could be removed, if desired, by post-processing to smooth the data. If these factors are taken into consideration, however, measurements of vehicle ground speed can be made for a wide variety of applications.
Information furnished by GMH Engineering is believed to be accurate & reliable. No responsibility is assumed, however, by GMH Engineering for its use, whether correct or incorrect; nor can GMH Engineering be held liable for consequences or any infringements of patents or other rights of third parties which may result from its use. Information in this document is subject to change. Rev. M1 - 13 Mar. 07 |